1. We welcome any feedback, questions or comments. * Kom gjerne med spørsmål, kommentarer, forslag, etc.
<<<  hunwww.is   >>>
Samarbeide, vennskap og fellesskap for reell etablert reell respekt for de felles-menneskelige verdier, vern, rettigheter, ansvar og forpliktelser.
Collaborating, friendship and fellowship for real established real respect for the common human values​​, protections, rights, responsibilities and obligations.
 

   From Russia about the Norwegian terror-regime:

   ”However, the brutal practice continues to prosper in Norway, where no one is going to apologize for anything.”


Norway offers residence permits in exchange for children
http://english.pravda.ru/society/stories/12-08-2011/118735-norway-0/
english.pravda.ru
In accordance with the laws of Norway, any child, who lives in the country, is protected by the state. It is the state that can decide whether a child shall live with biological or foster parents. The decisions taken by local…

*

Rune L. Hansen:
Yes, it is grotesque. Kidnapping of children, is a big industry in Norway.

Rune L. Hansen:
Good and interesting comments too. Here one of them:
Banda-Kulu Banya · Top Commenter
Bjørnar Torjussen Bjørnar, Anders Breivik that you and the system people are calling a terrorist is your Norwegian brother. And a product of the Norwegian environment. The State and the environment that you are defending or saying is perfect drove him to do what he did on the 22 July 2011. The State`s response is not to stop its oppressions, suppression, State torture, persecutions and human rights violations but to try to dump him in psychiatry to close the case. I therefore say that Breivik has 75% of Norwegians that understand him. Educated and experienced friends of mine will say that he has 75% of Norwegians supporting him. The same thing goes for the case of gross abuses of children. A minimum of 95% of Norwegians do not support what the State does. The statistics of children growing up in the hands of the Norwegian Child care State system is very frightening. But the Norwegian people cannot bother to speak because it will lead to State oppression, persecution, isolation, torture, human rights abuses etc.

*

Rune L. Hansen:
One more:
Snorre McCookie
@Gordon King
I really think you are right.
We, the Norwegian people, will NEVER EVER get the actual truth about anything from the government.
The Norwegian media may seem to be free, but it is all about what the government LETS us know.
I am from Norway myself and I am taking Media and Communications as a class, I’m on the second year right now and form the education we are receiving and it seems like the Media is entirely government controlled.
And also, it is a completely stupid law that the CPS (Child Protection Services) have higher authority than the Judges, they make it seem like they stand above the law.

*

Rune L. Hansen:
And one more:
Knut Holt · Top Commenter
The number of children taken by the Norwegian child protective system is proportional to the capacity of the system. Give that system the double amount of money, and they will take doubly as many children. That system is given steadily higher capcity, monetarily and instrumentally, and caretakers of children like teachers, kindergarten personal, health care professionals, etc are systematically trained to be the servants of this ystem.
Norway have got a system that is comparable to the secret police in the former DDR, the so-called Stasi, and every family that do not conform to a very strict politically correct normality scheme is in danger.

*

Rune L. Hansen:
The terror-regime in Norway don’t follow laws actually existing in Norway, they just manipulate with their own illegal laws and regulations, contrary to law.

Rune L. Hansen:
In fact the existing superior law and right in and for Norway is and shall be both the Norwegian Penal Code, Norwegian Human Rights Act and the Norwegian Constitution. But the criminals in and around the public administration does not respect the law and order.

Rune L. Hansen:
Those many in and around the public administration that make money, career or status of the child-robbery industry defends the grotesque criminal activity and are making threats, prizes, propaganda and advertisements for it.  It becomes and is thus a kind of “hidden” civil war.

Rune L. Hansen:
And a genoicide.

Rune L. Hansen:
A genocide and a crime against humanity and human dignity.

Rune L. Hansen:
Fra norske Straffelovens – LOV 2005-05-20 nr 28: Lov om straff (straffeloven)
http://www.lovdata.no/all/hl-20050520-028.html#map019
Kapittel 16. Folkemord, forbrytelse mot menneskeheten og krigsforbrytelse
Kapitlet tilføyd ved lov 7 mars 2008 nr. 4, og satt ikr. 7 mars 2008 iflg. res. 7 mars 2008 nr. 225.
§ 101. Folkemord:
For folkemord straffes den som i hensikt helt eller delvis å ødelegge en nasjonal, etnisk, rasemessig eller religiøs gruppe
a)    dreper ett eller flere medlemmer av gruppen,
b)    forårsaker betydelig skade på kropp eller helse til ett eller flere medlemmer av gruppen,
c)    utsetter ett eller flere medlemmer av gruppen for levevilkår som tar sikte på å fysisk ødelegge gruppen, helt eller delvis,
d)    iverksetter tiltak overfor ett eller flere medlemmer av gruppen som tar sikte på å forhindre fødsler innenfor gruppen, eller
e)    med makt overfører ett eller flere barn fra gruppen til en annen gruppe.
Til straff for medvirkning er forsett om hovedforøverens ødeleggelseshensikt tilstrekkelig.
Straffen for folkemord er fengsel inntil 30 år.
Ikr. 7 mars 2008 iflg. res. 7 mars 2008 nr. 225.
Endret ved lov 19 juni 2009 nr. 74.

Rune L. Hansen:
§ 102. Forbrytelse mot menneskeheten
For forbrytelse mot menneskeheten straffes den som, som ledd i et utbredt eller systematisk angrep rettet mot en sivilbefolkning,
a)    dreper en person,
b)    utrydder en befolkning helt eller delvis, herunder utsetter den eller deler av den for levekår som tar sikte på å utrydde befolkningen helt eller delvis,
c)    gjør en person til slave,
d)    deporterer eller tvangsflytter en befolkning i strid med folkeretten,
e)    fengsler eller på annen alvorlig måte berøver en person friheten i strid med grunnleggende folkerettslige regler,
f)    torturerer en person i vedkommendes varetekt eller kontroll ved å forårsake alvorlig psykisk eller fysisk smerte,
g)    utsetter en person for voldtekt, seksuelt slaveri eller tvungen prostitusjon, tvungent svangerskap, tvangssterilisering eller annen tilsvarende grov seksuell vold,
h)    utsetter en identifiserbar gruppe for forfølgelse ved å berøve ett eller flere medlemmer av gruppen grunnleggende menneskerettigheter på politisk, rasemessig, nasjonalt, etnisk, kulturelt, religiøst, kjønnsbasert eller annet folkerettsstridig grunnlag,
i)    på vegne av, eller med samtykke, støtte eller tillatelse av en stat eller en politisk organisasjon bidrar til at en person forsvinner ufrivillig, med det forsett å unndra vedkommende fra lovens beskyttelse for et lengre tidsrom,
j)    innenfor rammen av et institusjonalisert regime basert på én rasemessig gruppes systematiske undertrykking og dominans over en eller flere andre rasemessige grupper begår en apartheidforbrytelse ved å foreta umenneskelige handlinger av samme eller liknende art som de som er omfattet av paragrafen her i den hensikt å opprettholde regimet, eller
k)    begår en annen umenneskelig handling av liknende art som forårsaker store lidelser eller alvorlig skade på kropp eller helse.
Straffen for forbrytelse mot menneskeheten er fengsel inntil 30 år.
Ikr. 7 mars 2008 iflg. res. 7 mars 2008 nr. 225.
Endret ved lov 19 juni 2009 nr. 74.

Rune L. Hansen:
§ 108. Forbund om og tilskynding til folkemord, forbrytelse mot menneskeheten og krigsforbrytelse
Med fengsel inntil 10 år straffes den som inngår forbund med noen om å begå lovbrudd som nevnt i §§ 101 til 107. Det samme gjelder den som direkte og offentlig tilskynder noen til å begå et slikt lovbrudd.
Ikr. 7 mars 2008 iflg. res. 7 mars 2008 nr. 225.

§ 109. Overordnedes ansvar
For krenkelse av overordnedes ansvar straffes en militær eller sivil leder eller en som faktisk opptrer som det, dersom personer under vedkommendes effektive myndighet og kontroll begår en forbrytelse som nevnt i §§ 101 til 107, når forbrytelsen er et resultat av at lederen ikke har utøvd forsvarlig kontroll over dem, og lederen
a)    visste eller burde ha visst at de underordnede hadde påbegynt en slik forbrytelse eller at den var umiddelbart forestående, og
b)    unnlot å iverksette nødvendige og rimelige tiltak som sto i vedkommendes makt for å hindre eller stanse forbrytelsen, eller å rapportere forholdet til en kompetent myndighet for strafforfølgning.
Straffen er fengsel inntil 10 år, men inntil 30 år der forbrytelsen er grov. Ved vurderingen av om forbrytelsen er grov, skal det legges vekt på hvor alvorlige og omfattende forbrytelser de underordnede har begått og i hvilken grad den overordnede er å bebreide.
Ikr. 7 mars 2008 iflg. res. 7 mars 2008 nr. 225.

§ 110. Minstestraff
Straff som utmåles etter bestemmelsene i dette kapitlet kan ikke settes under minstestraffen som er bestemt i straffebud som i mangel av kapittel 16 ville ha rammet handlingen det domfelles for.
Ikr. 7 mars 2008 iflg. res. 7 mars 2008 nr. 225.

 

Some more links:

http://hunwww.is/2012/02/11/more-from-russia-about-the-norwegian-terror-regime/

http://hunwww.is/2011/12/25/kidnapping-of-children-a-big-industry-in-norway/

— 

 

Human Rights Council
Resolution 9/11.  Right to the truth
The Human Rights Council,
Guided by the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and the Protocols Additional thereto of 1977, and other relevant instruments of international human rights law and international humanitarian law, as well as the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action,
Recognizing the universality, indivisibility, interdependence and interrelatedness of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights,
Recalling article 32 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, which recognizes the right of families to know the fate of their relatives,
Recalling also that article 33 of Additional Protocol I provides that the parties to an armed conflict shall search for the persons who have been reported missing, as soon as circumstances permit,
Recalling further the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, adopted by the General Assembly in its resolution 61/177, in which article 24 (2) sets out the right of victims to know the truth regarding the circumstances of the enforced disappearance, the progress and results of the investigation and the fate of the disappeared person, and sets forth State party obligations to take appropriate measures in this regard, and the preamble reaffirms the right to freedom to seek, receive and impart information to that end,
Taking into account resolution 2005/66 of the Commission on Human Rights and Council decision 2/105 on the right to the truth,
page 2
Acknowledging the reports of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the right to the truth (E/CN.4/2006/91, A/HRC/5/7) and its significant conclusions related to the right to know the truth about gross violations of human rights and serious violations of international humanitarian law,
Stressing that adequate steps to identify victims should also be taken in situations not amounting to armed conflict, especially in cases of massive or systematic violations of human rights,
Recalling the set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity (E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20/Rev.1, annex II) and taking note with appreciation of the updated version of those principles (E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1),
Noting that the Human Rights Committee1 and the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances (E/CN.4/1999/62) have recognized the right of the victims of gross violations of human rights and the right of their relatives to the truth about the events that have taken place, including the identification of the perpetrators of the facts that gave rise to such violations,
Acknowledging, in cases of gross violations of human rights and serious violations of international humanitarian law, the need to study the interrelationship between the right to the truth and the right to access to justice, the right to obtain effective remedy and reparation, and other relevant human rights,
Stressing the importance for the international community to endeavour to recognize the right of victims of gross violations of human rights and serious violations of international humanitarian law, and their families and society as a whole, to know the truth regarding such violations, to the fullest extent practicable, in particular, the identity of the perpetrators, the causes and facts of such violations, and the circumstances under which they occurred,
Stressing also that it is important for States to provide appropriate and effective mechanisms for society as a whole and, in particular, for relatives of the victims, to know the
1 Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-first Session, Supplement No. 40 (A/51/40).
A/HRC/9/L.12
page 3
truth regarding gross violations of human rights and serious violations of international humanitarian law,
Recalling that a specific right to the truth may be characterized differently in some legal systems as the right to know or the right to be informed or freedom of information,
Emphasizing that the public and individuals are entitled to have access, to the fullest extent practicable, to information regarding the actions and decision-making processes of their Government, within the framework of each State’s domestic legal system,
Convinced that States should preserve archives and other evidence concerning gross violations of human rights and serious violations of international humanitarian law to facilitate knowledge of such violations, to investigate allegations and to provide victims with access to an effective remedy in accordance with international law,
1. Recognizes the importance of respecting and ensuring the right to the truth so as to contribute to ending impunity and to promote and protect human rights;
2. Welcomes the establishment in several States of specific judicial mechanisms and other non-judicial mechanisms such as truth and reconciliation commissions, that complement the justice system, to investigate violations of human rights and violations of international humanitarian law, and appreciates the elaboration and publication of the reports and decisions of these bodies;
3. Encourages the States concerned to disseminate, implement and monitor implementation of the recommendations of non-judicial mechanisms such as truth and reconciliation commissions, and provide information regarding compliance with the decisions of judicial mechanisms;
4. Encourages other States to consider establishing specific judicial mechanisms and, where appropriate, truth and reconciliation commissions to complement the justice system, to investigate and address gross violations of human rights and serious violations of international humanitarian law;
page 4
5. Encourages States to provide requesting States the necessary and appropriate assistance regarding the right to the truth by means of, among other actions, technical cooperation and exchange of information concerning administrative, legislative and judicial and non-judicial measures, as well as experiences and best practices that have as a purpose the protection, promotion and implementation of this right;
6. Encourages all States that have not done so to consider signing, ratifying or acceding to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance;
7. Requests the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to prepare a comprehensive study, to be presented to the Council at its twelfth session, on best practices for the effective implementation of this right, including, in particular, practices relating to archives and records concerning gross violations of human rights with a view to create guidelines on protecting archives and records concerning gross human rights violations, and programmes for the protection of witnesses and other persons involved in trials connected with such violations;
8. Also requests the Office of the High Commissioner to prepare a report, to be presented to the Council at its fifteenth session, on the use of forensic experts in case of gross violations of human rights with a view to identifying trends and best practices in this regard;
9. Decides to convene a panel to discuss issues related to the present resolution at its thirteenth session;
10. Invites special rapporteurs and other mechanisms of the Council, in the framework of their mandates, to take into account, as appropriate, the issue of the right to the truth;
11. Decides to consider this matter at its twelfth session under the same agenda item or at the corresponding session in conformity with its annual programme of work.
—–

 

http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/HRC/resolutions/A_HRC_RES_9_11.pdf

*

United-Nations.jpg

 

*

 

 A child’s nightmare called Norway

Read about it on this link:

   http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/article2854163.ece
www.thehindubusinessline.com
When news broke out of the three-year-old Abhigyan and infant-in-arms Aishwarya stranded in foster care in Norway, one wondered if the black humour of Roald Dahl had materialised for real. In children’s stories, Dahl, the famous English writer born of Norwegian parents, presented the world from the …

Very happy to see that the world is about to discover a little of what really happens in Norway (and Sweden)!!! 

 

*

Kidnapping of children, is a big industry in Norway.  A grotesque instrument for criminals in and around the public administration.

Read more about it on this link:

http://hunwww.is/2011/12/25/kidnapping-of-children-a-big-industry-in-norway/

 

*

 


 

Trampling human rights in Norway

– Swapan Dasgupta

“In the matter of bringing up children, what the Norwegian authorities are demanding is not emotional sustenance but homogenisation. These are the hallmarks of a totalitarian system that believes children belong primarily to the state.”

Read more:
http://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2012/01/27/trampling-human-rights-in-norway-swapan-dasgupta/#comment-5555

 

*

— And here a translation to Norwegian / Og her en oversettelse til norsk:
http://www.nyhetsspeilet.no/2012/01/indiadom-inhumanitet-i-norge/

*

More stuff about this on this link:

http://hunwww.is/2011/12/25/kidnapping-of-children-a-big-industry-in-norway/

 

*

 

It is 100% true what this article says about Norway and Sweden.    An article in The Hindu, 2nd largest in India: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/article2842917.ece      The Hindu : Opinion / Op-Ed : The iron hand that rocks the cradle      www.thehindu.com Almost all families attacked by Norway’s ‘child protection services’ are good and loving.  Some need help but most of them need nothing other than to be left in peace.     *

 

Update, September 1, 2011 - 

“In the case of the Ketterling family, the local school rector is attempting to require them to obtain psychological help for one of their children. The reason? One of their children is 8 years old and can only read very slowly. The parents have the right to refuse this request, yet the rector is threatening to inform the Child Protective Services if the family does not cooperate. As it is wise for homeschoolers to maintain a good relationship with their local officials, the family covets your prayer support for wisdom to know how to handle the situation.”

– Read more about it on this link:

http://www.hslda.org/hs/international/Norway/201108250.asp

 

*

 

The Martin Luther King You Don’t See on TV
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2269
www.fair.org
It’s become a TV ritual: Every year in mid-January, around the time of Martin Luther King’s birthday, we get perfunctory network news reports about “the slain civil rights leader.” The remarkable thing about this annual review of King’s life is that se

*

 

“How To Fight CPS” Page
Defend Yourself Against False Allegations

http://familyrights.us/how_to/fight_cps.html 

We help families learn how to fight the utterly lawless, unethical, perjurious
and immoral CPS in the unconstitutional courts of NO Due Process.

*

 

Torture and out-plundering under the auspices of the political public administration also big bizniz in England.

(Tortur og utplyndring i regi av den politiske offentlige forvaltningen også big bizniz i England.)


http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/torture-breaking-family-unit
The Torture Of The Breaking Family Unit | UK Column
www.ukcolumn.org
The agony of the family separating was indescribable torture. The children were given contact with us twice a week at our family home for 1.5 hours. We were always under visual supervision, with other “specialists” there observing us and our interaction with the children.

*

 

Angående lister for og med krav og underskrifter fra sivil-befolkningen

 

Det er mange steder på Internettet hvor en gratis kan opprette og presentere en eller flere slike lister.

Også kan det gjøres her på hunwww.is, hvilket f.eks. følgende link er et eksempel på:

http://hunwww.is/2011/12/28/krav-nr-1-fra-sivil-befolkningen-i-norge/ 

Et annet sted og eksempel på norsk er f.eks. følgende eksterne link:

http://www.underskrift.no/ 

Se der f.eks. følgende underskrifts-liste:

FORANDRER GRUNNLOVEN, SÅ DE KAN OVERSTYRE FOLKET LETTERE. DETTE MÅ STOPPES, VI ER TOTALT SVIKTET AV MEDIA SOM IKKE SETTER I GANG EN OFFENTLIG DEBATT OM DE FULLE KONSEKVENSENE OM HVA EN SLIK LOV ENDRING VIL MEDFØRE. SIGNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nei tiil snikinnmelding av Norge i EU – underskrift.no
http://www.underskrift.no/vis.asp?kampanje=3726
www.underskrift.no
Opprett egne underskriftskampanjer GRATIS!

Et eksempel på engelsk hos:

http://www.change.org 

& der http://www.change.org/start-a-petition 

& f.eks.

 http://www.change.org/petitions/office-of-the-high-commissioner-for-human-rights-united-nations-stop-sweden-from-criminalizing-the-truth 

 

Om slike lister, med eller uten krav, har noen virkning eller effekt er kanskje et annet tema.

Kanskje noen har lyst til å si noe om det også?

 

 

 

 

© 2011 hunwww.is Kravet om reell respekt for menneske-rettighetene er en selvfølgelighet - og en minste-standard! Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha